concept / Tattva and Philosophy

Brahman

Ultimate reality as a question interpreted differently across Vedānta traditions.

Introductory record · Updated 2026-11-07
Introductory source-based synthesis. External references were consulted for the stated scope; specialist peer review is not claimed.

A term with an argument behind it

In Vedānta, brahman concerns ultimate reality and the basis of the world. Translating it simply as “God” or “the absolute” can conceal the question a particular author is answering. The term brahman should also be distinguished from Brahmā, the deity, and from brāhmaṇa, a word with other social and textual uses.

Nonduality and qualified unity

For Śaṅkara’s Advaita, the essential self is not ultimately separate from brahman. Rāmānuja instead articulates a unity that includes real selves and the world, identifying the supreme with Nārāyaṇa. These are different philosophical positions. A connected archive can place them beside each other without declaring them equivalent.

Read the claim in context

When a passage mentions brahman, note the text, the commentator and whether the discussion concerns knowledge, causation, worship or liberation. Ask what distinctions the argument retains and which it challenges. This introductory record maps a disagreement; it does not offer a definition intended to replace each tradition’s account.

Questions to carry

  • 01What relation between brahman, selves and world does this commentator defend?
  • 02What does a translation leave unexplained?

Sources & further reading

  1. 01
    Śaṅkara · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophyscholarly secondary

    Reference consulted for the introductory account; follow the source for its full context.

    Consulted 2026-11-07
  2. 02
    Shyam Ranganathan · Rāmānuja · Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophyscholarly secondary

    Reference consulted for the introductory account; follow the source for its full context.

    Consulted 2026-11-07
  3. 03
    Monotheism · Śrī Vaiṣṇavas section · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophyscholarly secondary

    Reference consulted for the introductory account; follow the source for its full context.

    Consulted 2026-11-07